4.7 Article

A physical explanation for the development of redox microzones in hyporheic flow

Journal

GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS
Volume 42, Issue 11, Pages 4402-4410

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1002/2015GL064200

Keywords

hyporheic; microzone; microsite; denitrification; biogeochemical; mass transfer

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [EAR-1446300, EAR-1446328]
  2. U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) Office of Groundwater, USGS National Research Program
  3. Groundwater Resources Programand Toxic Substances Hydrology Program
  4. Leverhulme Trust
  5. Department of Energy Environmental Remediation Science Program [DE-SC0001773]
  6. Division Of Earth Sciences
  7. Directorate For Geosciences [1446328, 1446300] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recent observations reveal a paradox of anaerobic respiration occurring in seemingly oxic-saturated sediments. Here we demonstrate a residence time-based explanation for this paradox. Specifically, we show how microzones favorable to anaerobic respiration processes (e.g., denitrification, metal reduction, and methanogenesis) can develop in the embedded less mobile porosity of bulk-oxic hyporheic zones. Anoxic microzones develop when transport time from the streambed to the pore center exceeds a characteristic uptake time of oxygen. A two-dimensional pore-network model was used to quantify how anoxic microzones develop across a range of hyporheic flow and oxygen uptake conditions. Two types of microzones develop: flow invariant and flow dependent. The former is stable across variable hydrologic conditions, whereas the formation and extent of the latter are sensitive to flow rate and orientation. Therefore, pore-scale residence time heterogeneity, which can now be evaluated in situ, offers a simple explanation for anaerobic signals occurring in oxic pore waters.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available