4.7 Article

Membrane fluxes, bypass flows, and sodium stress in rice: the influence of silicon

Journal

JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BOTANY
Volume 69, Issue 7, Pages 1679-1692

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erx460

Keywords

Apoplast; efflux; influx; Oryza sativa L.; cvs Pokkali and IR29; rice; salt stress; silicon; sodium accumulation; sodium transport; transpirational bypass flow

Categories

Funding

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Council of Canada (NSERC)
  2. Canadian Research Chair (CRC) program
  3. Ontario Graduate Scholarship (OGS) program
  4. University of Toronto

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Provision of silicon (Si) to roots of rice (Oryza sativa L.) can alleviate salt stress by blocking apoplastic, transpirational bypass flow of Na+ from root to shoot. However, little is known about how Si affects Na+ fluxes across cell membranes. Here, we measured radiotracer fluxes of Na-24(+), plasma membrane depolarization, tissue ion accumulation, and transpirational bypass flow, to examine the influence of Si on Na+ transport patterns in hydroponically grown, salt-sensitive (cv. IR29) and salt-tolerant (cv. Pokkali) rice. Si increased growth and lowered [Na+] in shoots of both cultivars, with minor effects in roots; neither root nor shoot [K+] were affected. In IR29, Si lowered shoot [Na+] via a large reduction in bypass flow, while in Pokkali, where bypass flow was small and not affected by Si, this was achieved mainly via a growth dilution of shoot Na+. Si had no effect on unidirectional 24Na(+) fluxes (influx and efflux), or on Na+-stimulated plasma-membrane depolarization, in either IR29 or Pokkali. We conclude that, while Si can reduce Na+ translocation via bypass flow in some (but not all) rice cultivars, it does not affect unidirectional Na+ transport or Na+ cycling in roots, either across root cell membranes or within the bulk root apoplast.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available