4.5 Article

Variation in hearing within a wild population of beluga whales (Delphinapterus leucas)

Journal

JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BIOLOGY
Volume 221, Issue 9, Pages -

Publisher

COMPANY BIOLOGISTS LTD
DOI: 10.1242/jeb.171959

Keywords

Noise; Marine mammal; Cetacean; Odontocete; Arctic

Categories

Funding

  1. Marine Mammal Laboratory of the Alaska Fisheries Science Center (MML/AFSC)
  2. Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution (Arctic Research Initiative, Ocean Life Institute and Marine Mammal Center)
  3. National Marine Fisheries Service Alaska Regional Office (NMFS AKR)
  4. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
  5. Bristol Bay Native Association
  6. Bristol Bay Marine Mammal Council
  7. Alaska SeaLife Center
  8. Shedd Aquarium
  9. Mystic Aquarium
  10. Office of Naval Research [N000141210203]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Documenting hearing abilities is vital to understanding a species' acoustic ecology and for predicting the impacts of increasing anthropogenic noise. Cetaceans use sound for essential biological functions such as foraging, navigation and communication; hearing is considered to be their primary sensory modality. Yet, we know little regarding the hearing of most, if not all, cetacean populations, which limits our understanding of their sensory ecology, population level variability and the potential impacts of increasing anthropogenic noise. We obtained audiograms (5.6-150 kHz) of 26 wild beluga whales to measure hearing thresholds during capture-release events in Bristol Bay, AK, USA, using auditory evoked potential methods. The goal was to establish the baseline population audiogram, incidences of hearing loss and general variability in wild beluga whales. In general, belugas showed sensitive hearing with low thresholds (<80 dB) from 16 to 100 kHz, and most individuals (76%) responded to at least 120 kHz. Despite belugas often showing sensitive hearing, thresholds were usually above or approached the lowambient noise levels measured in the area, suggesting that a quiet environment may be associated with hearing sensitivity and that hearing thresholds in the most sensitive animals may have been masked. Although this is just one wild population, the success of the method suggests that it should be applied to other populations and species to better assess potential differences. Bristol Bay beluga audiograms showed substantial (30-70 dB) variation among individuals; this variation increased at higher frequencies. Differences among individual belugas reflect that testing multiple individuals of a population is necessary to best describe maximum sensitivity and population variance. The results of this study quadruple the number of individual beluga whales for which audiograms have been conducted and provide the first auditory data for a population of healthy wild odontocetes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available