4.5 Article

Negligible differences in metabolism and thermal tolerance between diploid and triploid Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar)

Journal

JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BIOLOGY
Volume 221, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

COMPANY BIOLOGISTS LTD
DOI: 10.1242/jeb.166975

Keywords

Critical thermal maxima; Elevated temperature; Oxygen consumption; Salmonids; Ploidy

Categories

Funding

  1. Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO)
  2. University of Tasmania
  3. Australian Research Training Program

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The mechanisms that underlie thermal tolerance in aquatic ectotherms remain unresolved. Triploid fish have been reported to exhibit lower thermal tolerance than diploids, offering a potential model organism to better understand the physiological drivers of thermal tolerance. Here, we compared triploid and diploid juvenile Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) in freshwater to investigate the proposed link between aerobic capacity and thermal tolerance. We measured specific growth rates (SGR) and resting (aerobic) metabolic rates (RMR) in freshwater at 3, 7 and 9 weeks of acclimation to 10, 14 and 18 degrees C. Additionally, maximum metabolic rates (MMR) were measured at 3 and 7 weeks of acclimation, and critical thermal maxima (CTmax) were measured at 9 weeks. Mass, SGR and RMR differed between ploidies across all temperatures at the beginning of the acclimation period, but all three metrics were similar across ploidies by week 7. Aerobic scope (MMR-RMR) remained consistent across ploidies, acclimation temperatures and time. At 9 weeks, CTmax was independent of ploidy, but correlated positively with acclimation temperature despite the similar aerobic scope between acclimation groups. Our findings suggest that acute thermal tolerance is not modulated by aerobic scope, and the altered genome of triploid Atlantic salmon does not translate to reduced thermal tolerance of juvenile fish in freshwater.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available