4.6 Article

Study of the anti-MRSA activity of Rhizoma coptidis by chemical fingerprinting and broth microdilution methods

Journal

CHINESE JOURNAL OF NATURAL MEDICINES
Volume 12, Issue 5, Pages 393-400

Publisher

CHINESE JOURNAL NATURAL MEDICINES
DOI: 10.1016/S1875-5364(14)60049-2

Keywords

MRSA; Rhizoma coptidis; mecA and norA gene; Broth microdilution method; Preparative liquid chromatography

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81073043]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

AIM: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is a pathogenic bacterium that causes both hospital- and community-acquired infections, and for which single-drug treatments are becoming less efficient. Rhizoma coptidis has been used for more than two thousand years in China to treat diarrhea, fever, and jaundice. In this study, the anti-MRSA activity of Rhizoma coptidis is examined and its effective components sought. METHODS: The mecA and norA genes were determined by PCR amplification and sequencing. Drug susceptibility of Staphylococcus aureus ATCC43300 was performed using the VITEK2 compact system. The chemical fingerprint of Rhizoma coptidis was investigated using HPLC and preparative liquid chromatography, and the anti-MRSA activity was determined using an improved broth microdilution method. RESULTS: The drug susceptibility test revealed that the penicillin-binding protein phenotype of the strain changed in comparison to penicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus. Ten batches of Rhizoma coptidis showed anti-MRSA activity on the norA-negative Staphylococcus aureus strain, as well as the strain that contained a norA gene. The spectrum-effect relationship revealed that the berberine alkaloids were the effective components, within which berberine, coptisine, palmatine, epiberberine,, and jatrorrhizine were the major components. CONCLUSION: This study lays a foundation for in vivo studies of Rhizoma coptidis and for the development of multi-component drugs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available