4.2 Article

Associations of stream geomorphic conditions and prevalence of alternative reproductive tactics among sockeye salmon populations

Journal

JOURNAL OF EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY
Volume 31, Issue 2, Pages 239-253

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jeb.13217

Keywords

geomorphology; jack; reproductive tactic; salmon; sneaker

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation - Dynamics of Coupled Natural and Human Systems Program
  2. Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation
  3. Alaska seafood processing industry

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In many species, males may exhibit alternative life histories to circumvent the costs of intrasexual competition and female courtship. While the evolution and underlying genetic and physiological mechanisms behind alternative reproductive tactics are well studied, there has been less consideration of the ecological factors that regulate their prevalence. Here, we examine six decades of age composition records from thirty-six populations of sockeye salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka) to quantify associations between spawning habitat characteristics and the prevalence of precocious sneakers known as jacks'. Jack prevalence was independent of neutral genetic structure among stream populations, but varied among habitat types and as a function of continuous geomorphic characteristics. Jacks were more common in streams relative to beaches and rivers, and their prevalence was negatively associated with stream width, depth, elevation, slope and area, but positively related to bank cover. Behavioural observations showed that jacks made greater use of banks, wood and shallows than guard males, indicating that their reproductive success depends on the availability of such refuges. Our results emphasize the role of the physical habitat in shaping reproductive tactic frequencies among populations, likely through local adaptation in response to variable fitness expectations under different geomorphic conditions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available