3.8 Article

Quality of life of Nigerians living with human immunodeficiency virus

Journal

PAN AFRICAN MEDICAL JOURNAL
Volume 18, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

AFRICAN FIELD EPIDEMIOLOGY NETWORK-AFENET
DOI: 10.11604/pamj.2014.18.234.2816

Keywords

Quality of life (QOL); Human immunodeficiency virus; acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS); people living with HIV/AIDS; Nigeria

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Introduction: Few reports from Nigeria have examined the quality of life (QOL) of people living with HIV/AIDS (PLWHA) despite the fact that Nigeria has the second largest number of PLWHA in the world. This study evaluated the QOL of Nigerians living with HIV/AIDS using the World Health Organization Quality of Life Questionnaire for HIV-Brief Version (WHOQOL-BREF) instrument and assessed the impact of demographic, laboratory and disease-related variables on QOL. Methods: This cross-sectional study involved 491 consecutive PLWHA aged >= 18 years attending the dedicated clinic to PLWHA in South-west Nigeria. Results: The lowest mean QOL scores were recorded in the environment and social domains. Participants aged >= 40 years had better QOL in the environment (p = 0.039) and spirituality (p = 0.033) domains and those in relationships had better QOL in the social relationship domain (p = 0.002). Subjects with no or primary education and those who rated their health status as good gave significantly higher ratings in all QOL domains. Participants with AIDS had significant lower QOL in the level of independence domain (p = 0.018) and those with CD4 count = 350 cells /mm3 had better QOL scores in the physical, psychological and level of independence domains. Subjects without tuberculosis co-infection and those on antiretroviral therapy (ART) reported significantly better QOL in the physical, psychological, level of independence and spirituality domains. Conclusion: Marital relationship, absence of tuberculosis, CD4 count = 350 cells /mm3 and use of ART positively impacted QOL of our patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available