4.2 Article

Association of serum levels of perfluoroalkyl substances with gestational diabetes mellitus and postpartum blood glucose

Journal

JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Volume 69, Issue -, Pages 5-11

Publisher

SCIENCE PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.jes.2018.03.016

Keywords

Perfluoroalkyl substances; Gestational diabetes mellitus; Blood glucose

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21537001, 21477030]
  2. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2017YFC1600502]
  3. Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDB14010100]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study was conducted to examine the association of perfluoroalkyl substance (PFAS) exposure with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) risk and postpartum fasting blood glucose. We used a 1: 2 matched case-control study with 84 GDM subjects and 168 healthy pregnant women from Beijing, China. The maternal blood was collected at 1-2 days before delivery, and eight linear isomers and fourteen branched isomers were determined in maternal serum. Logistic regression analyses were performed to evaluate the associations after adjusting for potential confounders. The median of the sum of levels of total PFASs was 4.24 ng/mL with a interquartile range (IQR) of 2.82-6.54 ng/mL. Although maternal PFAS exposure was not associated with risk of GDM, significant positive associations were observed between evaluated exposure to specific PFAS congeners and increasing blood glucose. The odds ratio (ORs) of the highest category of postpartum fasting blood glucose for perfluoro-1-metylheptylsulfonat (1m-PFOS), perfluoro-3/4-metylheptylsulfonat (3m+4m-PFOS), perfluoro-5-metylheptylsulfonat (5m-PFOS), and perfluorohexane sulfonate (PFHxS) were 2.03 (95% CI: 1.09-3.77), 1.93 (95% CI: 1.04-3.58), 2.48 (95% CI: 1.33-4.65), and 2.26 (95% CI: 1.21-4.21), respectively, suggesting negative effects of maternal exposure to specific PFAS compounds on glucose metabolism. (C) 2018 The Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available