4.4 Article Proceedings Paper

Transfer parameters for ICRP's Reference Animals and Plants in a terrestrial Mediterranean ecosystem

Journal

JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACTIVITY
Volume 186, Issue -, Pages 9-22

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2017.06.024

Keywords

Reference Animal and Plant; Mediterranean ecosystem; Concentration ratios; Transfer; Non-human biota; Wildlife

Funding

  1. project TREE [NE/L000318/1]
  2. UK NERC
  3. Environment Agency
  4. Radioactive Waste Management Ltd.
  5. COMET project [Fission-2012-3.4.1-604794]
  6. Autonomous Government of Extremadura (Junta de Extremadura) [FQM001]
  7. Consejeria de Educacion y Empleo of Junta de Extremadura [MOV15B006]
  8. NERC [NE/L000504/1, NE/L000318/1, NE/L000520/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  9. Natural Environment Research Council [NE/L000520/1, NE/L000318/1, NE/L000504/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A system for the radiological protection of the environment (or wildlife) based on Reference Animals and Plants (RAPs) has been suggested by the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP). To assess whole-body activity concentrations for RAPs and the resultant internal dose rates, transfer parameters are required. However, transfer values specifically for the taxonomic families defined for the RAPs are often sparse and furthermore can be extremely site dependent. There is also a considerable geographical bias within available transfer data, with few data for Mediterranean ecosystems. In the present work, stable element concentrations (I, Li, Be, B, Na, Mg, Al, P, S, K. Ca, Ti, V, Cr, Mn, Fe, Co, Ni, Cu, Zn, As, Se, Rb, Sr, Mo, Ag, Cd, Cs, Ba, Tl, Pb and U) in terrestrial RAPs, and the corresponding whole-body concentration ratios, CRwo, were determined in two different Mediterranean ecosystems: a Pinewood and a Dehesa (grassland with disperse tree cover). The RAPs considered in the Pinewood ecosystem were Pine Tree and Wild Grass; whereas in the Dehesa ecosystem those considered were Deer, Rat, Earthworm, Bee, Frog, Duck and Wild Grass. The CRwo values estimated from these data are compared to those reported in international compilations and databases. (C) 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available