4.4 Article

Crop Rotations and Poultry Litter Affect Dynamic Soil Chemical Properties and Soil Biota Long Term

Journal

JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
Volume 47, Issue 6, Pages 1327-1338

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.2134/jeq2017.12.0465

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Dynamic soil chemical interactions with conservation agricultural practices and soil biota are largely unknown. Therefore, this study aims to quantify long-term (12-yr) impacts of cover crops, poultry litter, crop rotations, no-tillage, and their interactions on dynamic soil properties and to determine their relationships with nutrient cycling, crop yield, and soil biodiversity (soil microbial and earthworm communities). Main effects were 13 different cropping sequences of soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.], corn (Zea mays L.), and cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) at the Research and Education Center at Milan, TN, and eight sequences of corn and soybean at the Middle Tennessee Research and Education Center, Spring Hill, TN. Sequences were repeated in 4-yr phases from 2002 to 2014. Split-block cover crop treatments consisted of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), hairy vetch (Vicia villosa Roth), poultry litter, and a fallow control. Soil C and nutrient fluxes were calculated at surface (0-5 cm) and subsurface (5-15 cm) layers during Years 0, 2, 4, 8, and 12. After 12 yr, weighted means (0-15 cm) of soil pH, P, K, Ca, Mg, total N, and C were greater under poultry litter-amended soils compared with cover crops (P < 0.05). In addition, continuous corn sequences resulted in greater soil K, N, and C concentrations than soybean-soybean-corn-corn rotations (P < 0.05). Poultry litter treatments were positively correlated with greater soil fertility levels, as well as higher crop yield and soil biodiversity. These results underscore linkages between manure additions and cropping sequences, within the nutrient cycling, soil health, and crop production continuum.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available