4.7 Article

Sludge reduction by ozone: Insights and modeling of the dose-response effects

Journal

JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
Volume 206, Issue -, Pages 103-112

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.10.023

Keywords

Activated sludge; COD fractions; Dose-response; Modeling; Ozonation; Sludge minimization

Funding

  1. CONACYT [152943]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Applying ozone to the return flow in an activated sludge (AS) process is a way for reducing the residual solids production. To be able to extend the activated sludge models to the ozone-AS process, adequate prediction of the tri-atoms effects on the particulate COD fractions is needed. In this study, the biomass inactivation, COD mineralization, and solids dissolution were quantified in batch tests and dose-response models were developed as a function of the reacted ozone doses (ROD). Three kinds of model-sludge were used. S1 was a lab-cultivated synthetic sludge with two components (heterotrophs X-H and X-p). S2 was a digestate of S1 almost made by the endogenous residues, Xp. S3 was from a municipal activated sludge plant. The specific ozone uptake rate (SO3UR, mgO(3)/gCOD.h) was determined as a tool for characterizing the reactivity of the sludges. SO3UR increased with the X-H fraction and decreased with more X-p. Biomass inactivation was exponential (e(-beta.ROD)) as a function of the ROD doses. The percentage of solids reduction was predictable through a linear model (C-Miner + Y-sol ROD), with a fixed part due to mineralization (C-Miner) and a variable part from the solubilization process. The parameters of the models, i.e. the inactivation and the dissolution yields ((beta, 0.008-0.029 (mgO(3)/mgCOD(ini))(-1) vs Y-sol, 0.5-2.8 mg CODsol/mgO(3)) varied in magnitude, depending on the intensity of the scavenging reactions and potentially the compactness of the flocs for each sludge. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available