4.7 Article

Optimization of hydrogen and organic acids productions with autochthonous and allochthonous bacteria from sugarcane bagasse in batch reactors

Journal

JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
Volume 223, Issue -, Pages 952-963

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.07.015

Keywords

Cellulosic substrate; Central composite design; Fermentation; Endogenous bacteria; Sugarcane bagasse

Funding

  1. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (CNPq) [142415/ 2014-6]
  2. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo (FAPESP) [15/06246-7]
  3. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo (FAPESP) [15/06246-7] Funding Source: FAPESP

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The individual and mutual effects of substrate concentration (from 0.8 to 9.2 g/L) and pH (from 4.6 to 7.4) on hydrogen and volatile fatty acids production from sugarcane bagasse (SCB) were investigated in batch reactors, using a response surface methodology (RSM) and central composite design (CCD). The maximum of 23.10 mmoL H-2/L was obtained under optimized conditions of 7.0 g SCB/L and pH 7.2, at 37 degrees C through the acetic acid pathway (1.57 g/L). Butyric and succinic acids were the major volatile fatty acids (VFA) produced in the fermentation process (from 0.66 to 1.88 g/L and from 1.06 to 1.65 g/L, respectively). According to the results, the RSM and CCD were useful tools to achieve high hydrogen production rates using Clostridium, Bacillus and Enterobacter, identified by Illumina sequencing (16S RNAr) in the fermentative consortium, and Clostridium and Paenibacillus, autochthonous bacteria from SCB. Significant changes were observed in the microbial community according to the changes in the independent variables, since the genera in the central point condition (5.0 g SCB/L and pH 6.0) were Lactobacillus, Escherichia and Clostridium, and Bacteroides and Enterobacter, which were identified in the optimized condition (7.0 g SCB/L and pH 7.2).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available