Integrated hydro-environmental impact assessment and alternative selection of low impact development practices in small urban catchments

Attention is increasingly being paid to low impact development (LID) practices in urban stormwater management. Because LID practices offer a wide variety of hydro-environmental benefits, it is often necessary to account for these benefits collectively in cost-benefit analysis and LID alternative selection. The conventional methods of quantifying these benefits, however, can hardly incorporate the preferences of decision makers, and commonly involve tedious parameter estimations. To address these shortcomings, this study adopts a relative performance evaluation method to assess the various hydro-environmental impacts of LID alternatives in small urban catchments. This study considers several categories of hydro-environmental impacts, including water balance impact, surface pollutant load abatement, and combined sewer overflow and flood risk mitigation. Several performance indicators are used for each impact category. The system-wide effectiveness of an LID alternative is then derived by the weighted aggregation of its indicator scores, which are obtained by comparing its performance with that of all of the other alternatives. The hydro-environmental impact of green roofs and bioretention cells of varying areas in New York City, U.S. are investigated in detail. The results suggest that a green roof that covers the whole catchment is as effective as a bioretention cell that covers 3%-5% of the catchment in terms of stormwater management, and that the effectiveness of a bioretention cell doubles when its surface area increases from 2% to 10% of the catchment area. These assessment results are influenced by catchment-specific assessment criteria (e.g., the high flow threshold) and management interests, which suggests that design guidelines for different catchments should be tailored to their natural and drainage characteristics. The framework used in this study allows stakeholders' interests to be reflected in LID alternative selections and the implications of different design guidelines to be thoroughly investigated.