4.7 Article

Short-term effects of nanoscale Zero-Valent Iron (nZVI) and hydraulic shock during high-rate anammox wastewater treatment

Journal

JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
Volume 215, Issue -, Pages 248-257

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.03.069

Keywords

Anammox; nZVI shock; Hydraulic shock; Combined shock

Funding

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [51578204]
  2. Science and Technology Development Program of Hangzhou [20170533B09]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The stability and resilience of an anaerobic ammonium oxidation (anammox) system under transient nanoscale Zero-Valent Iron (nZVI) (50, 75 and 100 mg L-1), hydraulic shock (2-fold increase in flow rate) and their combination were studied in an up-flow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor. The response to the shock loads can be divided into three phases i.e. shock, inertial and recovery periods. The effects of the shock loads were directly proportional to the shock intensity. The effluent quality was gradually deteriorated after exposure to high nZVI level (100 mg L-1) for 2 h. The higher effluent sensitivity index and response caused by unit intensity of shock was observed under hydraulic and combined shocks. Notably, the specific anammox activity and the content of heme c were considerably reduced during the shock phase and the maximum loss rates were about 30.5% and 24.8%, respectively. Nevertheless, the extra cellular polymeric substance amount in the shock phase was enhanced in varying degrees and variation tendency was disparate at all the tested shock loads. These results suggested that robustness of the anammox system was dependent on the magnitude shocks applied and the reactor resistance can be improved by reducing hydraulic retention time with the increase of nZVI concentration under these circumstances. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available