4.7 Article

Environmental governance in China: Interactions between the state and nonstate actors

Journal

JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
Volume 220, Issue -, Pages 126-135

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.04.104

Keywords

Nonstate actors; Environmental governance; she hui tuanti (social group); shi ye danwei (public service unit); Belt and Road initiative

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In the West, limited government capacity to solve environmental problems has triggered the rise of a variety of nonstate actors to supplement government efforts or provide alternative mechanisms for addressing environmental issues. How does this development - along with our efforts to understand it map onto environmental governance processes in China? China's efforts to address environmental issues reflect institutionalized governance processes that differ from parallel western processes in ways that have major consequences for domestic environmental governance practices and the governance of China going abroad. China's governance processes blur the distinction between the state and other actors; the shadow of the state is a major factor in all efforts to address environmental issues. The space occupied by nonstate actors in western systems is occupied by shiye danwei (public service units), she hui tuanti (social associations) and e-platforms, all of which have close links to the state. Meanwhile, international NGOs and multinational corporations are also significant players in China. As a result, the mechanisms of influence that produce effects in China differ in important ways from mechanisms familiar from the western experience. This conclusion has far-reaching implications for those seeking to address global environmental concerns, given the importance of China's growing economy and burgeoning network of trade relationships. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available