4.5 Article

Anti-Mullerian hormone overexpression restricts preantral ovarian follicle survival

Journal

JOURNAL OF ENDOCRINOLOGY
Volume 237, Issue 2, Pages 153-163

Publisher

BIOSCIENTIFICA LTD
DOI: 10.1530/JOE-18-0005

Keywords

anti-Mullerian hormone; ovary; folliculogenesis; oogenesis; embryo

Funding

  1. Health Research Council of New Zealand [14-441]
  2. Society for Reproductive Biology Early Career Researcher Collaborative Research Travel Award

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) is an ovarian regulator that affects folliculogenesis. AMH inhibits the developmental activation of the dormant primordial follicles and the oocyte within. In more mature follicles, AMH reduces granulosa cell sensitivity to folliclestimulating hormone (FSH). We examined the effects of AMH overexpression on the stages of ovarian folliculogenesis, and the development of embryos, with a transgenic mouse that overexpresses human AMH in central nervous system neurons under the control of the mouse Thy1.2 promoter (Thy1.2-AMH(Tg) mice). These mice are severely sub-fertile, despite relatively normal ovulation rates. The embryos of Thy1.2-AMH(Tg) females exhibited delayed preimplantation development and extensive mid-gestation fetal resorption. Young Thy1.2-AMH(Tg) mouse ovaries exhibited only a slight reduction in the rate of primordial follicle activation but large declines in the number of developing follicles surviving past the primary stage. It was expected that Thy1.2-AMH(Tg) mice would retain more primordial follicles as they aged, but at 5 months, their number was significantly reduced relative to wild-type females. These data indicate that moderate elevations in AMH levels can severely restrict reproductive output and the number of developing follicles in the ovary. This evidence suggests that early antral follicles are a target for AMH signaling, which may regulate early follicle survival.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available