4.6 Article

Demography and Uncertainty of Population Growth of Conogethes punctiferalis (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) Reared on Five Host Plants With Discussion on Some Life History Statistics

Journal

JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC ENTOMOLOGY
Volume 111, Issue 5, Pages 2143-2152

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/jee/toy202

Keywords

Conogethes punctiferalis; life table; demographic characteristics; host plants

Categories

Funding

  1. National Key Research and Development Plan in China [2016YFD0300701]
  2. Shandong Modern Agricultural Technology and Industry System [SDAIT-02-10]
  3. Taishan Scholar Construction Engineering [TS201712023]
  4. Funds of Shandong Double Tops Program [SYL2017XTTD11]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The development, survival, and fecundity data of Conogethes punctiferalis (Guenee) (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) reared on chestnut (Castanea mollissima Blume), maize (Zea mays L.), sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.), hawthorn (Crataegus pinnatifida Bunge), and apple (Malus domestica Miller) were collected at 25 +/- 1 degrees C and 70 +/- 5% RH. Raw data were analyzed and compared by using the age-stage, two-sex life table. The mean fecundity (F) was the highest (282.3 eggs per female) when larvae were reared on chestnut. The lowest mean fecundity (19.2 eggs per female) occurred on apple.The net reproductive rates (R-0) were 134.52, 106.77, 30.29, 27.61, and 8.63 offspring on chestnut, maize, sunflower, hawthorn, and apple, respectively. The intrinsic rates of increase (r) were 0.1359, 0.1326, 0.0807, 0.0811, and 0.0448 d(-1) on chestnut, maize, sunflower, hawthorn, and apple, respectively. Computer projections based on the age-stage, two-sex life table revealed the stage structure and variability of the population growth of C. punctiferalis. Our results demonstrated that although chestnut and maize were the most suitable host plants for C. punctiferalis, the moths were also able to develop and reproduce on sunflower, hawthorn, and apple.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available