4.3 Article

Skeletal muscle mass reference curves for children and adolescents

Journal

PEDIATRIC OBESITY
Volume 9, Issue 4, Pages 249-259

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.2047-6310.2013.00168.x

Keywords

Bioelectrical impedance; centiles; fat-free mass; skeletal muscle mass

Categories

Funding

  1. Tanita UK
  2. MRC [MC_U123292701, MC_U105960389] Funding Source: UKRI
  3. Medical Research Council [MC_U105960389, MC_U123292701] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Skeletal muscle is key to motor development and represents a major metabolic end organ that aids glycaemic regulation. Objectives: To create gender-specific reference curves for fat-free mass (FFM) and appendicular (limb) skeletal muscle mass (SMMa) in children and adolescents. To examine the muscle-to-fat ratio in relation to body mass index (BMI) for age and gender. Methods: Body composition was measured by segmental bioelectrical impedance (BIA, Tanita BC418) in 1985 Caucasian children aged 5-18.8 years. Skeletal muscle mass data from the four limbs were used to derive smoothed centile curves and the muscle-to-fat ratio. Results: The centile curves illustrate the developmental patterns of %FFM and SMMa. While the %FFM curves differ markedly between boys and girls, the SMMa (kg), %SMMa and %SMMa/FFM show some similarities in shape and variance, together with some gender-specific characteristics. Existing BMI curves do not reveal these gender differences. Muscle-to-fat ratio showed a very wide range with means differing between boys and girls and across fifths of BMI z-score. Conclusions: BIA assessment of %FFM and SMMa represents a significant advance in nutritional assessment since these body composition components are associated with metabolic health. Muscle-to-fat ratio has the potential to provide a better index of future metabolic health.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available