4.3 Article

Cardiovascular benefits of combined interval training and post-exercise nutrition in type 2 diabetes

Journal

JOURNAL OF DIABETES AND ITS COMPLICATIONS
Volume 32, Issue 2, Pages 226-233

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2017.10.002

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Dairy Farmers of Canada

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aim: The purpose of this study was to examine whether the combination of high-intensity interval training (HIIT) and post-exercise protein supplementation would improve cardiovascular outcomes in individuals with T2D. Methods: In a double-blind controlled trial, fifty-three adults with T2D (free of CVD and not on exogenous insulin) were randomized to 12 weeks of cardio and resistance-based HIIT (4-10 x 1 min at 90% maximal heart rate) with post-exercise milk, milk-protein, or placebo supplementation, thrice weekly. Before and after, carotid and femoral artery intima media thickness (IMT) and femoral flow profiles were assessed using high-resolution ultrasound. Central and peripheral arterial stiffness were assessed by pulse wave velocity (PWV), and resting and maximal heart rate rates were measured. Results: After 12 weeks of HIIT femoral IMT (Pre: 0.84 +/- 0.21 mm vs. Post: 0.81 +/- 0.16 mm, p = 0.03), carotid femoral PWV (Pre: 10.1 +/- 32 m/s vs. Post: 8.6 +/- 1.8 m/s, p < 0.01) and resting heart rate (Pre: 70.4 +/- 10.8 bpm vs. Post: 67.8 +/- 8.6 bpm, p = 0.01) were all significantly lower. There were no differences between nutrition groups (all significant main effects of time) for all outcomes. Conclusion: HIIT reduces femoral IMT, arterial stiffness and resting heart rate in individuals with T2D. The addition of post-exercise milk or protein to HIIT did not have additive effects for improving cardiovascular outcomes in the present study. Taken together, HIIT alone may bean effective means to reduce the burden of cardiovascular complications in T2D. (C) 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available