4.5 Article

Working with fathers to improve children's well-being: Results of a survey exploring service provision and intervention approach in the UK

Journal

CHILDREN AND YOUTH SERVICES REVIEW
Volume 43, Issue -, Pages 40-50

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2014.04.009

Keywords

Fathers; Interventions; Parenting; Theories; Practice

Funding

  1. Economic and Social Research Council [ES/H043632/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  2. Medical Research Council [MR/K023233/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  3. ESRC [ES/H043632/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. MRC [MR/K023233/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Interventions for fathers are a recent growth area in family services. Although some specific approaches are beginning to be evaluated, there is little known about what kinds of interventions are more generally being used in practice. A web-based survey of practitioners was conducted in the UK, with contact being made via local authority service managers. Two hundred and twenty-one responses were received from 53% of local authorities. Both interventions specifically for fathers and services for both parents were targeted in the survey. Results are reported on organisational location; targeting of services; type of intervention; numbers and percentages of men attending services, recruitment of fathers; evaluation strategies; and ideological and theoretical approaches. Numbers of fathers engaged are relatively low - e.g. the median annual number of fathers attending structured parenting courses was eight and in courses for both parents, 21% of those attending were men. Responses on ideological and theoretical approaches suggest that overt gender politics play only a small part, but that the dominant views of practitioners are in line with mainstream approaches to parenting support. Cognitive and behavioral approaches were the most popular. (C) 2014 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available