4.6 Article

A new model of Earth's radial conductivity structure derived from over 10 yr of satellite and observatory magnetic data

Journal

GEOPHYSICAL JOURNAL INTERNATIONAL
Volume 203, Issue 3, Pages 1864-1872

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/gji/ggv407

Keywords

Time-series analysis; Geomagnetic induction; Magnetic and electrical properties; Composition of the mantle

Funding

  1. Swiss National Science Foundation [2000021-140711/1]
  2. Russian Foundation for Basic Research [13-05-12111]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present a new model of the radial (1-D) conductivity structure of Earth's mantle. This model is derived from more than 10 yr of magnetic measurements from the satellites Orsted, CHAMP, SAC-C and the Swarm trio as well as the global network of geomagnetic observatories. After removal of core and crustal field as predicted by a recent field model, we fit the magnetic data with spherical harmonic coefficients describing ring current activity and associated induction effects and estimate global C-responses at periods between 1.5 and 150 d. The C-responses are corrected for 3-D effects due to induction in the oceans and inverted for a 1-D model of mantle conductivity using both probabilistic and deterministic methods. Very similar results are obtained, consisting of a highly resistive upper mantle, an increase in conductivity in and beneath the transition zone and a conductive lower mantle. Analysis of the Hessian of the cost function reveals that the data are most sensitive to structures at depths between 800 and 1200 km, in agreement with the results obtained from the probabilistic approach. Preliminary interpretation of the inverted conductivity structure based on laboratory-based conductivity profiles shows that the recovered structure in the lower mantle either requires higher temperatures or the presence of material of high conductivity related to ponding of carbonate melts below the transition zone.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available