4.5 Article

Three-dimensional volumetric analysis of condylar head and glenoid cavity after mandibular advancement

Journal

JOURNAL OF CRANIO-MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY
Volume 46, Issue 9, Pages 1470-1475

Publisher

CHURCHILL LIVINGSTONE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2018.06.001

Keywords

Condylar resorption; Glenoid cavity; Temporomandibular joint; Orthognathic surgery; SSRO; Mandibular advancement

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The aim of this study was to assess condylar resorption, spatial change in glenoid cavity, and its risk factors after mandibular advancement by three-dimensional volumetric analysis. Subjects consisted of 30 condyles of 15 patients diagnosed with mandibular retrognathism who underwent Le Fort I and bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy advancement. CBCT images were taken before surgery (TO), immediately after surgery (T1), and postoperatively at 6 months (T2) and 1 year (T3). Condylar resorption was observed in 21 condyles. The posterior was the most affected region, while the anterior was the least affected. The volume of the glenoid cavity was significantly increased after surgery regardless of the presence or absence of resorption. However, the cavity recovered close to its original volume over time. At 1 year after surgery, the volume was not significantly different from the preoperative volume. Counterclockwise rotation of the proximal segment was found to be a risk factor affecting resorption based on correlation analysis. Mandibular advancement appeared to generate excessive mechanical stress on the posterior condyle, and might be responsible for the resorption. Counterclockwise rotation might have added stress to the region. Articular spatial change was transient and did not appear to be related to condyle resorption. (C) 2018 European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available