4.8 Article

Bilayer polymeric nanocapsules: A formulation approach for a thermostable and adjuvanted E. coli antigen vaccine

Journal

JOURNAL OF CONTROLLED RELEASE
Volume 286, Issue -, Pages 20-32

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2018.07.018

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. CDTI (Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation)
  2. Fondo Tecnologico (Xunta de Galicia, FEDER funds) [Fondo Tecnologico (Xunta de Galicia, FEDER funds)]
  3. Grupos de referencia competitiva (Xunta de Galicia) [ED431C 2016041, EDC431C2017/57, ED431C 2017/09]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

One of the strategies used to improve the immunogenicity of purified protein antigens has relied on their association with synthetic nanocarriers, which, in general, have functioned as simple antigen containers. Here, we present a more advanced strategy based on the design of an antigen nanocarrier at the molecular level. The nanocarrier is composed of a vitamin E oily core, surrounded by two layers: a first layer of chitosan and a second of dextran sulphate. The selected antigen, IutA protein from Escherichia coli, was harboured between the two polymeric layers. The final bilayer nanocapsules had a nanometric size (approximate to 200 nm), a negative zeta potential (< -40 mV) and a good antigen association efficiency (approximate to 70%). The bilayer architecture led to an improvement on the formulation stability and the controlled release of the associated antigen. Remarkably, after being administered to mice, bilayer nanocapsules elicited higher IgG levels than those obtained with antigen precipitated with Alum. Moreover, freeze-dried nanocapsules were stable at room temperature for, at least, 3 months. These promising data, in addition to their contribution to the development of an uropathogenic E. coli vaccine, has allowed us to validate these novel bilayer nanocapsules as adequate platforms for the delivery of protein antigens.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available