4.7 Article

Practical error bounds for a non-intrusive bi-fidelity approach to parametric/stochastic model reduction

Journal

JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL PHYSICS
Volume 368, Issue -, Pages 315-332

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2018.04.015

Keywords

Matrix interpolative decomposition; Uncertainty quantification; Low-rank approximation; Multi-fidelity approximation; Bi-fidelity approximation; Parametric model reduction

Funding

  1. DARPA EQuiPS project [N660011524053]
  2. United States Department of Energy under the Predictive Science Academic Alliance Program 2 (PSAAP2) at Stanford University
  3. U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science, Office of Advances Scientific Computing Research [DE-SC0006402]
  4. NSF [CMMI-145460]
  5. AFOSR [FA9550-15-1-0467]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

For practical model-based demands, such as design space exploration and uncertainty quantification (UQ), a high-fidelity model that produces accurate outputs often has high computational cost, while a low-fidelity model with less accurate outputs has low computational cost. It is often possible to construct a bi-fidelity model having accuracy comparable with the high-fidelity model and computational cost comparable with the low-fidelity model. This work presents the construction and analysis of a non-intrusive (i.e., sample-based) bi-fidelity model that relies on the low-rank structure of the map between model parameters/uncertain inputs and the solution of interest, if exists. Specifically, we derive a novel, pragmatic estimate for the error committed by this bi-fidelity model. We show that this error bound can be used to determine if a given pair of low- and high-fidelity models will lead to an accurate bi-fidelity approximation. The cost of this error bound is relatively small and depends on the solution rank. The value of this error estimate is demonstrated using two example problems in the context of UQ, involving linear and non-linear partial differential equations. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available