4.4 Article

Hydrogen bonding in the mixed HF/HCl dimer: Is it better to give or receive?

Journal

JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 39, Issue 14, Pages 839-843

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jcc.25157

Keywords

hydrogen bonding; dissociation energies; coupled cluster method (CCSD(T)); complete basis set (CBS) limit; second-order vibrational perturbation theory (VPT2)

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation Office of Integrative Activities [1430364]
  2. National Science Foundation Division of Chemistry [1338056, 1664998]
  3. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  4. Division Of Chemistry [1664998] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  5. Division Of Chemistry
  6. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1338056] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  7. Office Of The Director
  8. Office of Integrative Activities [1430364, 1430280] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The ClHFH and FHClH configurations of the mixed HF/HCl dimer (where the donoracceptor notation indicates the directionality of the hydrogen bond) as well as the transition state connecting the two configurations have been optimized using MP2 and CCSD(T) with correlation consistent basis sets as large as aug-cc-pV(5+d)Z. Harmonic vibrational frequencies confirmed that both configurations correspond to minima and that the transition state has exactly one imaginary frequency. In addition, anharmonic vibrational frequencies computed with second-order vibrational perturbation theory (VPT2) are within 6 cm(-1) of the available experimental values and deviate by no more than 4 cm(-1) for the complexation induced HF frequency shifts. The CCSD(T) electronic energies obtained with the largest basis set indicate that the barrier height is 0.40 kcal mol(-1) and the FHClH configuration lies 0.19 kcal mol(-1) below the ClHFH configuration. While only modestly attenuating the barrier height, the inclusion of either the harmonic or anharmonic zero-point vibrational energy effectively makes both minima isoenergetic, with the ClHFH configuration being lower by only 0.03 kcal mol(-1). (c) 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available