4.6 Article

Neogene cratonic erosion fluxes and landform evolution processes from regional regolith mapping (Burkina Faso, West Africa)

Journal

GEOMORPHOLOGY
Volume 241, Issue -, Pages 315-330

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2015.04.006

Keywords

Regolith; Pediment; Landform evolution processes; Sediment routing system; Source to sink

Funding

  1. WAXI
  2. CNRS
  3. ANR TopoAfrica [ANR-08-BLAN-572 0247-02]
  4. AusAid [P934A]
  5. ARC Linkage Project [P934A, LP110100667]
  6. Geological Surveys/Departments of Mines in West Africa

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The regionally correlated and dated regolith-paleolandform sequence of Sub-Saharan West Africa offers a unique opportunity to constrain continental-scale regolith dynamics as the key part of the sediment routing system. In this study, a regolith mapping protocol is developed and applied at the scale of Southwestern Burkina Faso. Mapping combines field survey and remote sensing data to reconstruct the topography of the last pediplain that formed over West Africa in the Early and Mid-Miocene (24-11 Ma). The nature and preservation pattern of the pediplain are controlled by the spatial variation of bedrock lithology and are partitioned among large drainage basins. Quantification of pediplain dissection and drainage growth allows definition of a cratonic background denudation rate of 2 m/My and a minimum characteristic timescale of 20 Ma for shield resurfacing. These results may be used to simulate minimum export fluxes of drainage basins of constrained size over geological timescales. Background cratonic denudation results in a clastic export flux of similar to 4 t/km(2)/year, which is limited by low denudation efficiency of slope processes and correlatively high regolith storage capacity of tropical shields. These salient characteristics of shields' surface dynamics would tend to smooth the riverine export fluxes of shields through geological time. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available