4.6 Article

Clinical associations between acetylcholine levels and cholinesterase activity in saliva and gingival crevicular fluid and periodontal diseases

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY
Volume 45, Issue 10, Pages 1173-1183

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jcpe.12989

Keywords

acetylcholine; butyrylcholinesterase; gingivitis; IL-17; periodontitis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aim The oral mucosa possesses a non-neuronal cholinergic system. This study aimed to determine clinical evidence for a role of cholinergic mechanisms in the pathogenesis of periodontal diseases. Materials and MethodsResultsFifty healthy participants, 52 patients with gingivitis and 49 with periodontitis were recruited. Full periodontal parameters were recorded and saliva and gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) collected. Levels of acetylcholine and inflammatory mediators were quantified using commercially available assay kits. Acetylcholinesterase and butyrylcholinesterase activities were measured using a published biochemical assay. Acetylcholine levels are significantly elevated in saliva and GCF, whereas GCF levels of butyrylcholinesterase activity are significantly decreased, in patients with periodontal diseases. Acetylcholine levels in saliva and GCF correlated positively with clinical markers of disease severity and with increased levels of IL-17A and IL-17F. In contrast, butyrylcholinesterase activity levels in GCF showed significant negative correlations with clinical markers of disease severity and IL-17A and IL-17F levels. None of the findings were due to smoking. ConclusionsElevated acetylcholine levels and reduced butyrylcholinesterase activity are clinically associated with periodontal diseases and elevated levels of IL-17A and IL-17F. Therefore, non-neuronal cholinergic mechanisms may influence IL-17 biology and the aetiopathogenesis of periodontal diseases and therefore are possible therapeutic targets.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available