4.6 Article

Morbidity following transcrestal and lateral sinus floor elevation: A randomized trial

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY
Volume 45, Issue 9, Pages 1128-1139

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jcpe.12985

Keywords

alveolar process; bone regeneration; bone resorption; dental implants; maxillary sinus; minimally invasive; spiral cone-beam computed tomography; surgical procedures; tooth extraction

Funding

  1. Regione Emilia-Romagna Programma di Ricerca Regione-Universita Area 1 Ricerca Innovativa Bando Giovani Ricercatori Alessandro Liberati' 2013
  2. Osteology Foundation, Lucerne, Switzerland [13-063]
  3. [PRUA1GR-2013-00000168]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

AimTo comparatively evaluate the morbidity following maxillary sinus floor elevation according to either transcrestal (tSFE) or lateral (lSFE) approach with concomitant implant placement. Materials & MethodsPatients with 1 edentulous maxillary posterior site with residual bone height (RBH) of 3-6mm were enrolled. tSFE was performed in association with a xenograft and a collagen matrix. For lSFE, the sinus was grafted with the xenograft, and the antrostomy was covered with a membrane. Implants were inserted concomitantly. The postoperative course was assessed through questionnaires. Pain level (VAS(pain)) was recorded using a 100-mm visual analogue scale. ResultsTwenty-nine and 28 patients were included in tSFE and lSFE group, respectively. On the day of surgery, VAS(pain) was significantly higher for tSFE compared to lSFE, and similar from day 1 to 14. tSFE was characterized by significantly lower incidence of swelling, bruising and nasal discharge/bleeding. Significantly less severe limitation in swallowing, continuing daily activities, eating, speaking, opening the mouth and going to school/work was found for tSFE only at specific postsurgery intervals. ConclusionslSFE was associated with lower pain on the day of surgery, and tSFE revealed lower postoperative morbidity as well as more tolerable postoperative course.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available