4.6 Article

Shift in the subgingival microbiome following scaling and root planing in generalized aggressive periodontitis

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY
Volume 45, Issue 4, Pages 440-452

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jcpe.12862

Keywords

aggressive periodontitis; microbiome; root planing; scaling; sequencing

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81470740]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

AimTo investigate the shift in the subgingival microbiota under scaling and root planing (SRP) in patients with generalized aggressive periodontitis (GAgP). Materials and MethodsAfter undergoing supragingival scaling, 12 individuals with GAgP were enrolled in this longitudinal study. Full-mouth SRP was accomplished in 3weeks and re-evaluated 6weeks later. Pooled subgingival samples (posterior-mesial, posterior-buccal, anterior-mesial, and anterior-buccal) were obtained from each patient before SRP (pre-treatment group) and at the time of re-evaluation (post-treatment group). 16S rRNA PCR products were generated and sequenced after DNA isolation. ResultsUnder SRP, the diversity of the subgingival community was consistent, whereas genus-level biomarkers transformed from Porphyromonas, Treponema, and Fretibacterium to Actinomyces, Streptococcus, and Haemophilus. In a network analysis, pathogen-related and non-pathogen-related components were identified in both the pre- and post-treatment groups; the pathogen component was dramatically augmented, while the non-pathogen component shrank after treatment. Hubs were also distributed in both components pre-treatment and were confined to the pathogen component post-treatment. ConclusionsScaling and root planing decreased periodontal pathogens in the subgingival microbiota of patients with GAgP. However, the shift in the microbiota composition was characterized by the expansion of pathogen-related components and the contraction of non-pathogen-related components 6weeks after SRP. Clinicaltrials.gov #NCT03090282.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available