4.7 Article

Circulating Tumor Cell Number as a Response Measure of Prolonged Survival for Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: A Comparison With Prostate-Specific Antigen Across Five Randomized Phase III Clinical Trials

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
Volume 36, Issue 6, Pages 572-+

Publisher

AMER SOC CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2017.75.2998

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health (NIH) [P30-CA008748]
  2. NIH [P50-CA92629, R01-CA207220]
  3. Sidney Kimmel Center for Prostate and Urologic Cancers
  4. Prostate Cancer Foundation
  5. Department of Defense Prostate Cancer Research Program [PC121111]
  6. Janssen Diagnostics a division of Janssen Pharmaceutica NV
  7. Ortho Biotech Oncology Research and Development (a unit of Cougar Biotechnology)
  8. Medical Research Council of the United Kingdom
  9. Movember Centre of Excellence funding
  10. Experimental Cancer Medical Centre
  11. National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre
  12. Medivation
  13. Astellas Pharma Global Development
  14. Takeda Pharmaceuticals International
  15. Millennium Pharmaceuticals, a wholly owned subsidiary of Takeda Pharmaceutical
  16. Exelixis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

PurposeMeasures of response that are clinically meaningful and occur early are an unmet need in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer clinical research and practice. We explored, using individual patient data, week 13 circulating tumor cell (CTC) and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response end points in five prospective randomized phase III trials that enrolled a total of 6,081 patientsCOU-AA-301, AFFIRM, ELM-PC-5, ELM-PC-4, and COMET-1ClinicalTrials.Gov identifiers: NCT00638690, NCT00974311, NCT01193257, NCT01193244, and NCT01605227, respectively.MethodsEight response end points were explored. CTC nonzero at baseline and 0 at 13 weeks (CTC0); CTC conversion ( 5 CTCs at baseline, 4 at 13 weeksthe US Food and Drug Administration cleared response measure); a 30%, 50%, and 70% decrease in CTC count; and a 30%, 50%, and 70% decrease in PSA level. Patients missing week-13 values were considered nonresponders. The discriminatory strength of each end point with respect to overall survival in each trial was assessed using the weighted c-index.ResultsOf the eight response end points, CTC0 and CTC conversion had the highest weighted c-indices, with smaller standard deviations. For CTC0, the mean (standard deviation) was 0.81 (0.04); for CTC conversion, 0.79 (0.03); for 30% decrease in CTC count, 0.72 (0.06); for 50% decrease in CTC count, 0.72 (0.06); for 70% decrease in CTC count, 0.73 (0.05); for 30% decrease in PSA level, 0.71 (0.03); for 50% decrease in PSA level, 0.72 (0.06); and for 70% decrease in PSA level, 0.74 (0.05). Seventy-five percent of eligible patients could be evaluated with the CTC0 end point, compared with 51% with the CTC conversion end point.ConclusionThe CTC0 and CTC conversion end points had the highest discriminatory power for overall survival. Both are robust and meaningful response end points for early-phase metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer clinical trials. CTC0 is applicable to a significantly higher percentage of patients than CTC conversion.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available