Journal
DIALECTICAL ANTHROPOLOGY
Volume 38, Issue 3, Pages 333-351Publisher
SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10624-014-9355-0
Keywords
Evolutionary Psychology; Modularity; Human psychology; Human brain
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
The concept of modularity has been central in behavioral and neural sciences since the publication of Fodor's The Modularity of Mind (1983). Fodor strived to explain the functional architecture of the mind based on the distinction between modular and central systems. Modular systems were deemed to have certain architectural features, such as automaticity, encapsulation, and domain specificity. Evolutionary psychologists have adopted the concept to characterize purportedly evolved human adaptations. In an influential paper, Barrett and Kurzban (Psychol Rev 113(3): 628-647, 2006) proposed a definition of modules purely in terms of functional specialization. It is here argued that such strategy marks a shift in Evolutionary Psychology's theoretical emphasis, as it trivializes the investigation of proximate causes in evolutionary theorizing; furthermore, it leaves the door open to too much flexibility on what counts as evidence for purportedly evolved modules.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available