4.3 Article

TLR4 gene polymorphisms rs11536889 is associated with intracranial aneurysm susceptibility

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE
Volume 53, Issue -, Pages 165-170

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2018.04.074

Keywords

Intracranial aneurysm; Toll-like receptors; Polymorphisms; Genetic susceptibility; Genetic risk factors; Subarachnoid hemorrhage

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars [81525008]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Intracranial aneurysm (IA) is a common lesion which often present asymptomatic until the time of rupture and result in subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). The pathogenesis of IA formation is complex and is influenced by both genetic and environmental risk factors. For exploring the detailed molecular and cellular mechanisms involved in the pathogenesis of IA, recent studies indicated inflammatory pathways and their genetic variants may as potential biomarkers. In this study, functionally relevant polymorphisms in the toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) were screened in 330 IA patients and 313 controls from a Han Chinese population. Eight single nucleotide gene polymorphisms (SNPs) genotyped by the Improved Multiple Ligase Detection Reaction (iMLDR) method. Our results indicated that the presence of the minor allele (C) of the TLR4 SNP rs11536889 was associated with a decreased risk of IA (C vs. G, OR = 0.731; 95% CI 0.567-0.943; P = 0.017). This association was also present at the genotype level in a codominant model (GC vs. GG, OR = 0.447; 95% CI 0.226-0.884; P = 0.020) and a recessive model (CC vs. GG + GC, OR = 0.489; 95% CI 0.250-0.955; P = 0.035). In summary, we firstly found that the TLR4 SNP rs11536889 was significantly associated with the susceptibility of IA. Our results indicated TLR4 SNP rs11536889 may be a marker for IA risk, though the exact functional roles of TLR4 SNP rs11536889 in IA formation are still not very clear. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available