4.8 Article Publication with Expression of Concern

HMGB1 links chronic liver injury to progenitor responses and hepatocarcinogenesis (Publication with Expression of Concern. See vol. 129, pg. 1803, 2019)

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION
Volume 128, Issue 6, Pages 2436-2451

Publisher

AMER SOC CLINICAL INVESTIGATION INC
DOI: 10.1172/JCI91786

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIH [R01CA200597, 1R01DK116620, U01AA021912]
  2. Columbia University Cancer Center support grant [5P30CA013696]
  3. German Research Foundation [Hu 1953/1-1]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cell death is a key driver of disease progression and carcinogenesis in chronic liver disease (CLD), highlighted by the wellestablished clinical correlation between hepatocellular death and risk for the development of cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Moreover, hepatocellular death is sufficient to trigger fibrosis and HCC in mice. However, the pathways through which cell death drives CLD progression remain elusive. Here, we tested the hypothesis that high-mobility group box 1 (HMGB1), a damage-associated molecular pattern (DAMP) with key roles in acute liver injury, may link cell death to injury responses and hepatocarcinogenesis in CLD. While liver-specific HMGB1 deficiency did not significantly affect chronic injury responses such as fibrosis, regeneration, and inflammation, it inhibited ductular/progenitor cell expansion and hepatocyte metaplasia. HMGB1 promoted ductular expansion independently of active secretion in a nonautonomous fashion, consistent with its role as a DAMP. Liver-specific HMGB1 deficiency reduced HCC development in 3 mouse models of chronic injury but not in a model lacking chronic liver injury. As with CLD, HMGB1 ablation reduced the expression of progenitor and oncofetal markers, a key determinant of HCC aggressiveness, in tumors. In summary, HMGB1 links hepatocyte death to ductular reaction, progenitor signature, and hepatocarcinogenesis in CLD.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available