4.7 Article

The role of bubbles in generating fine ash during hydromagmatic eruptions

Journal

GEOLOGY
Volume 43, Issue 3, Pages 239-242

Publisher

GEOLOGICAL SOC AMER, INC
DOI: 10.1130/G36336.1

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. AXA Research Fund
  2. Royal Society University Research Fellowship
  3. University of Bristol scholarship

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The abundant fine ash produced in the 2011 subglacial eruption of Grimsvotn, Iceland, highlights the fragmentation efficiency of mafic hydromagmatic eruptions, which is considerably higher than for comparable dry eruptions. Ash from the 2011 eruption can be divided into three morphological components-vesicular particles, shards, and dense fragments-distinguished by the size and abundance of constituent vesicles. We use the vesicle characteristics to define a new shape factor, the concavity index, which provides an unbiased way to classify individual ash particles as either bubbly (vesicular particles and shards) or dense. The relative proportion of bubbly and dense particles varies systematically with grain size, with the proportion of bubbly grains decreasing as the particle size approaches the modal bubble diameter. Measured bubble volume distributions are similar to those of rapidly quenched pyroclasts from Hawaiian fountains and suggest a comparable degassing history during magma ascent. Yet concordance between the size distributions of ash and of bubbles in the Grimsvotn samples stands in contrast to the size distributions in Hawaiian fountains, where pyroclasts are orders of magnitude larger than individual bubbles. We propose that the Grimsvotn ash formed by brittle disintegration of vesicular pyroclasts and that fragmentation efficiency was amplified by residual thermal stresses in glass quenched by glacial water. The strong control of resulting particle sizes and morphologies by the size and spatial distribution of bubbles demonstrates that the bubble population cannot be ignored when modeling hydromagmatic fragmentation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available