4.3 Article

Organ damage changes in patients with resistant hypertension randomized to renal denervation or spironolactone: The DENERVHTA (Denervacion en Hipertension Arterial) study

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL HYPERTENSION
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages 69-75

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jch.13156

Keywords

albuminuria; arterial stiffness; carotid wall thickness; end organ damage; left ventricular hypertrophy; renal denervation; spironolactone

Funding

  1. Spanish Health Authority [EC11-426]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Renal denervation and spironolactone have both been proposed for the treatment of resistant hypertension, but their effects on preclinical target organ damage have not been compared. Twenty-four patients with 24-hour systolic blood pressure 140mmHg despite receiving three or more full-dose antihypertensive drugs, one a diuretic, were randomized to receive spironolactone or renal denervation. Changes in 24-hour blood pressure, urine albumin excretion, arterial stiffness, carotid intima-media thickness, and left ventricular mass index were evaluated at 6months. Mean baseline-adjusted difference between the two groups (spironolactone vs renal denervation) at 6months in 24-hour systolic blood pressure was -17.9mmHg (95% confidence interval [CI], -30.9 to -4.9; P=.01). Mean baseline-adjusted change in urine albumin excretion was -87.2 (95% CI, -164.5 to -9.9) and -23.8 (95% CI, -104.5 to 56.9), respectively (P=.028). Mean baseline-adjusted variation of 24-hour pulse pressure was -13.5 (95% CI, -18.8 to -8.2) and -2.1 (95% CI, -7.9 to 3.7), respectively (P=.006). The correlation of change in 24-hour systolic blood pressure with change in log-transformed urine albumin excretion was r=.713 (P<.001). At 6months there was a reduction in albuminuria in patients with resistant hypertension treated with spironolactone as compared with renal denervation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available