4.1 Article

The influence of long-term use of proton pump inhibitors on the gut microbiota: an age-sex-matched case-control study

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL BIOCHEMISTRY AND NUTRITION
Volume 62, Issue 1, Pages 100-105

Publisher

JOURNAL CLINICAL BIOCHEMISTRY & NUTRITION
DOI: 10.3164/jcbn.17-78

Keywords

proton pump inhibitors (PPIs); gut microbiota; 165 rRNA

Funding

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science [16K09322, 16H05289]
  2. National Agriculture and Food Research Organization
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [16H05289, 16K09322] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are widely used to treat gastro-esophageal reflux and prevent gastric ulcers, and have been considered as low risk. However, recent studies have identified possible associations between PPI use and gut microbiota, suggesting that PPIs use increases the risk of enteric infections, including Clostridium difficile infection. To investigate gut micro biota in Japanese PPIs users, we conducted 165 metagenomics analysis of fecal samples collected from PPI users and healthy adults. In total, 36 PPI users and 36 PPI non-users (as control subjects) matched by age and sex were recruited and fecal samples were obtained to analyze the gut microbiome using 16S rRNA gene sequencing. There were significant differences in the microbial structure between PPI non-users and PPI users. In contrast, the analysis of a-diversity revealed no significant differences between PPI non-users and PPI users. When comparing in genus level between these two groups, the genera Streptococcus was significantly abundant and the genera Faecalibacterium was significantly decreased in PPI users. Our findings indicate a probable association between PPI use and the alternation of microbiota. These alterations might provide a mechanism by which PPIs predispose enteric infection such as Clostridium difficile infection.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available