Journal
ENERGY RESEARCH & SOCIAL SCIENCE
Volume 3, Issue -, Pages 46-54Publisher
ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2014.07.003
Keywords
Community benefits; Framing; Public engagement; Wind farms
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
The provision of community benefits, payments to communities affected by renewable energy developments, has received significant policy-maker attention in recent years. This research explores whether the provision of community benefits associates with increased local support for a hypothetical, future offshore wind farm in Exmouth (UK), using an experimental methodology (n = 311). Participants were allocated to one of three framing conditions: (i) a 'no-framed condition', presenting basic information about a possible wind farm without mentioning community benefits; (ii) a 'community benefit frame', highlighting the likely community benefits that would accompany a wind farm; or ( iii) a ` dual framing' condition, presenting information about community benefits alongside critical perspectives that commonly surround these ( perceptions of ` bribery'). Support for the development was greatest under the community benefit frame. However, this heightened support diminished in a context of social contestation ( the dual framing condition). Elevated perceptions of collective rather than individual outcome favourability or procedural justice explained why support was greatest under the community benefit frame. Ensuring and communicating that community benefits offer a 'good deal' to communities, rather than focusing on individual benefits, may be the most viable avenue to increase support for renewable energy developments through community benefits. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available