4.7 Article

Southeast Greenland Winter Precipitation Strongly Linked to the Icelandic Low Position

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLIMATE
Volume 31, Issue 11, Pages 4483-4500

Publisher

AMER METEOROLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1175/JCLI-D-17-0622.1

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation (NSF) [PLR-1304805]
  2. NASA Interdisciplinary Sciences Grant [NNX14AD98G]
  3. NSF [PLR-1304805]
  4. NSF
  5. NASA
  6. NERC [cpom30001] Funding Source: UKRI
  7. Directorate For Geosciences
  8. Office of Polar Programs (OPP) [1304807] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Greenland's largest precipitation flux occurs in its southeast (SE) region during the winter, controlled primarily by easterly winds and frequent cyclogenesis in the NorthAtlantic. Several studies have attempted to link SE Greenland precipitation to the North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO) but results are inconsistent. This work uses reanalysis, automatic weather station data, and regional climate model output to show that the east-west position of the Icelandic low is a better predictor of SE Greenland precipitation (average correlation of r = -0.48 in DJF) than climate indices such as the NAO (r = -0.06 in DJF). In years when the Icelandic low is positioned extremely west, moisture transport increases up to similar to 40%(or up to 40 kgm(-1) s(-1)) off the SE Greenland coast compared to when the low is in an extreme east position. Furthermore, in years when the Icelandic low is positioned extremely west, storm track density and intensity increase just off the SE coast of Greenland. Thus, the Icelandic low's longitudinal position dominates SE Greenland ice sheet's wintertime precipitation, a positive term in the ice sheet mass balance. Given SE Greenland's importance in the overall ice sheet mass balance, the position of the Icelandic low is therefore important for making projections of future sea level.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available