4.6 Article

Structure evolutions involved in the carbonization of polyimide fibers with different chemical constitution

Journal

MATERIALS TODAY COMMUNICATIONS
Volume 1, Issue 1-2, Pages 1-8

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2014.08.001

Keywords

Polyimide fiber; Carbonization; Chemical and aggregation structure; evolutions

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [51373008]
  2. Higher School Specialized Research Fund for Doctoral Priority Areas of Development Project [20130010130001]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Two polyimide (PI) fibers with different chemical structures, pyromellitic dianhydride (PMDA)/4,4'-oxydianiline (ODA) and 3,3',4,4'-biphenyldianhydride (BPDA)/p-phenylenediamine(p-PDA)/2-(4aminophenyl)- 5-aminobenzimidazole (BIA) fibers, were prepared by wet-spinning process, and followedby carbonization with increasing temperature up to 1600 degrees C under a high-purity nitrogen atmosphere, resulting in PI-derived carbon fibers. The chemical structure evolutions were traced by Fourier transform infrared radiation spectrometer (FTIR), Elemental analyzer (EA), Thermogravimetry (TG) and the carbonization mechanism was discussed through the molecular simulation and thermo gravimetric-infraredradiation (TG-IR) analysis. The aggregation structure evolutions were characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD), Raman and scanning electron microscope (SEM) analyses. The graphite structure was formed and gradually became ordered by increasing temperature, finally resulting in carbon fibers with high carbon contents over 95% and high carbon yields over 50 wt%. Moreover, the carbon yields and graphitization degrees strongly depended on the chemical structures of PI fibers. The carbon fiber derived from BPDA/pPDA/BIA demonstrated higher carbon yields, more ordered and more well-defined graphite structuresthan that derived from PMDA/ODA. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available