4.7 Review

Energy consumption and environmental impact of rubberized asphalt pavement

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
Volume 180, Issue -, Pages 139-158

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.01.086

Keywords

Rubberized asphalt; Energy consumption; Greenhouse gas emissions; Environmental impact

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The focus of this paper is to evaluate the energy consumption and environmental impact of rubberized asphalt pavement during the life cycle. Reducing the environmental influences of the highway infrastructure has received the increasing attentions recently. Application of crumb rubber in asphalt pavements overcomes the used tires disposal problem and achieves materials savings and environmental benefits, due to the reduction of raw material and extension of pavement service life. In addition, rubberized asphalt production is a highly energy consuming process due to a higher mixing temperature. However, the warm mixing technology can lower the mixing temperature of rubberized asphalt mixture, leading to approximately 20-25% of fuel savings. Moreover, the consumed energy of rubberized asphalt during maintenance phase is lower than that of conventional asphalt. In addition, the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from the production and construction of rubberized asphalt mixtures are similar to those from hot mix asphalt, but their emissions of CO and CH4 are much lower. Meanwhile, the noise reduction is an environmentally friendly benefit. The leachate from asphalts used wet and dry-process crumb rubber modifiers (CRM) does not pose a measurable threat to the environment. Rubberized asphalt technology as a green technology in term of lowering GHG emissions, saving energy and raw material and reducing noise level of pavement should be widely used to achieve environmental sustainability. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available