4.7 Article

Barriers to promoting prefabricated construction in China: A cost-benefit analysis

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
Volume 172, Issue -, Pages 649-660

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.171

Keywords

Offsite construction; Prefabrication; Cost-benefit analysis; Case study

Funding

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2016YFC0701807, 2016YFC070160106, 2016YFC070200504]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [0204005201043]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Prefabricated construction has attracted worldwide concern because of its significant role in the creation of sustainable urbanization. In Mainland China, the practice of applying prefabrication technology in the construction industry still lags behind. In fact, the economic benefit is a key concern of various stake-holders involved in the construction process and is expected to influence the delivery of prefabricated buildings significantly. Therefore, this study established a cost benefit analysis framework to explore the basic cost composition of prefabrication and examined the effect of adopting prefabrication on the total cost of real building projects. Results show that the concrete and steel used in the typical prefabricated components were responsible for 26% to 60% of the total cost, followed by labor cost (17%-30%) and transportation (10%). The average incremental cost is highly linearly correlated with the prefabrication rate, which ranged from 237 yuan/m(2) to 437 yuan/m(2), in eight building projects. To fully gain the economic benefits from the precast construction, the future focus should lie in providing financial support for promoting the development of prefabrication technology, optimizing the structure integrity of prefabricated buildings, and improving the maturity of the precast market. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available