4.7 Article

Life cycle assessment of wire plus arc additive manufacturing compared to green sand casting and CNC milling in stainless steel

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
Volume 177, Issue -, Pages 438-447

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.148

Keywords

LCA; Additive manufacturing; Wire plus arc additive manufacturing; Metal 3D printing; Environmental impact

Funding

  1. Amsterdam institute of Advanced Metropolitan Solutions (AMS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Wire and Arc Additive Manufacturing (WAAM) is a metal 3D printing technique based on robotic welding. This technique yields potential in decreasing material consumption due to its high material efficiency and freedom of shape. Empirical measurements of WAAM, using a deposition rate of 1 kg/h, were performed on site of MX3D. The measured power consumption per kg stainless steel is 2.72 kW, of which 1.74 is consumed by the welder, 0.44 by the robotic arm, and 0.54 by the ventilation. The material loss was 1.1%. A 98% argon 2% CO2 welding gas was used with a flow of 12 l/min. A cradle-to-gate Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) was performed. To give this assessment context, green sand casting and CNC milling were additionally assessed, through literature and databases. The purpose of this study is to develop insight into the environmental impact of WAAM. Results indicate that, in terms of total ReCiPe endpoints, the environmental impact of producing a kg of stainless steel 3081 product using WAAM is comparable to green sand casting. It equals CNC milling with a material utilization fraction of 0.75. Stainless steel is the main cause of environmental damage in all three techniques, emphasizing the importance of WAAM's mass reduction potential. When environmentally comparing the three techniques for fulfilling a certain function, optimized designs should be introduced for each manufacturing technique. Results can vary significantly based on product shape, function, materials, and process settings. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available