4.7 Article

The effect of information provision on supermarket consumers' use of and preferences for carbon labels in Germany

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
Volume 172, Issue -, Pages 253-263

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.105

Keywords

Carbon footprint label; Information effect; Consumer; Preferences

Funding

  1. German Federal Ministry of Education and Research [17004X11]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To limit climate change, significant reductions in greenhouse gas emissions are needed. Changes to consumer behavior could be one strategy to reach emission reduction targets. In this context, the role of information is crucial. One way of informing consumers about the climate impact of their food choices is through labels on the packaging. Providing additional information about labels or climate friendly food behavior directly before the product choice is made can stimulate the use of and preferences for carbon labels. The main aim of this study was to analyze the effect of information provision on supermarket consumers in Germany and their use of and preferences for carbon labels. It was also studied which types of carbon labels consumers prefer and how important these labels are as a criterion for the product choice. Data from a focus group workshop and two in-store surveys, including a pair wise comparison experiment and two Discrete-Choice Experiments, were used. The results show that providing additional information about labels can enhance the use of these labels and increase consumers' focus on the labels when making their product choice. It can also influence the general decision to buy or not buy a product and the preferences for the existence of a label. Consumers prefer carbon labels which use a scale and a traffic light color system. However, carbon labels are generally not important in consumers' decision making process. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available