4.7 Article

Comparison of artificial intelligence methods in estimation of daily global solar radiation

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
Volume 194, Issue -, Pages 342-358

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.147

Keywords

Solar radiation; Group method of data handling; Adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system; Particle swarm optimization; Genetic algorithm; Ant colony

Funding

  1. Brazilian research agency, CAPES (Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Assessment of solar potential over a location of interest is introduced as an important step for the successful planning of solar energy systems (photovoltaic or thermal). Due to the absence of meteorological stations and sophisticated solar sensors, solar data may be unavailable for every point of interest. Hence, empirical and intelligence methods are developed to estimate solar irradiance data. In this study, the idea of artificial intelligence methods is employed to predict the daily global solar radiation. The developed models are: group method of data handling (GMDH) type neural network, multilayer feed forward neural network (MLFFNN), adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS), ANFIS optimized with particle swarm optimization algorithm (ANFIS-PSO), ANFIS optimized with genetic algorithm (ANFIS-GA) and ANFIS optimized with ant colony (ANFIS-ACO). The data are collected from 12 stations in different climate zones of Iran. The input variables of the models are including month, day, average air temperature, maximum air temperature, minimum air temperature, air pressure, relative humidity, wind speed, top of atmosphere insolation, latitude and longitude. The results demonstrated that although the developed models can successfully predict the global horizontal irradiance, the GMDH model outperforms the other developed models. The values of root mean square error (RMSE), determination coefficient (R-2) and mean square error (MSE) for the GMDH model were 0.2466 (kWh/m(2)/day), 0.9886 and 0.0608 (kWh/m(2)/day), respectively. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available