4.7 Article

Political embeddedness and the diffusion of corporate social responsibility practices in China: A trade-off between financial and CSR performance?

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
Volume 198, Issue -, Pages 1185-1197

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.116

Keywords

Corporate social responsibility (CSR) reporting; CSR performance; Political embeddedness; Government control; Political connections

Funding

  1. China Scholarship Council [201408210143]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study examines whether and how political embeddedness influences the diffusion of corporate social responsibility (CSR) practices in China. Specifically, we investigate how government ownership and political connections affect Chinese listed firms' likelihood of issuing CSR reports, as well as the underlying CSR performance (CSRP) and its relation to corporate financial performance (CFP). Using panel data from 15,419 publicly traded firm-year observations in China for the years 2008-2014, the results show that politically embedded firms, and in particular firms that are centrally politically embedded, are more likely to issue CSR reports than firms without political embeddedness. The results also indicate that politically embedded firms, on average, have a higher CSRP than non-politically embedded firms. In addition, we find that for politically embedded firms, CSRP is more negatively related to financial performance than for firms without political embeddedness. This indicates that political embeddedness also affects the trade-off between CFP and CSRP. Our research, thus, provides evidence not only of the effectiveness of government-induced CSR policies but also of their efficiency, i.e., the potential opportunity costs that the policies imply. Furthermore, our results show that different types and levels of political embeddedness play considerable but different roles in explaining firms' CSR-related practices. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available