4.7 Article

Valuable rubidium extraction from potassium reduced seawater brine

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
Volume 174, Issue -, Pages 1079-1088

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.042

Keywords

Potassium; Potassium copper hexacyanoferrate; Rubidium; Seawater reverse osmosis brine; Sorption; Zeolite

Funding

  1. Australian Research Council [DP150101377]
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Ministry of Education [2017R1A6A3A04004335]
  3. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Ministry of Science, ICT, AMP
  4. Future Planning [2017R1A2B3009675]
  5. National Research Foundation of Korea [2017R1A2B3009675, 2017R1A6A3A04004335] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Extraction of rubidium (Rb) which is an economically valuable metal from seawater reverse osmosis (SWRO) brine is beneficial. However, potassium (K) in SWRO brine hinders Rb extraction. Natural clinoptilolite zeolite in powder form was able to selectively remove K from SWRO brine (Langmuir maximum sorption, Qmax (cal.) = 57.47 +/- 0.09 mg/g). An integrated submerged membrane sorption reactor (SMSR) containing zeolite powder achieved 65% K removal from SWRO brine. Periodic replacement of zeolite in SMSR, coupled with membrane backwashing was effective in maintaining a high K removal efficiency and a stable transmembrane pressure. Less than 5% Rb losses occurred along with K sorption, establishing the high K selectivity by zeolite in SWRO brine. Utilization of K loaded zeolite as a slow release fertilizer would be beneficial for agriculture. In SWRO brine with reduced K contents, the Rb sorption efficiency of polymer encapsulated potassium copper hexacyanoferrate (KCuFC(PAN)) sorbent, increased significantly from 18% to 83%. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available