4.7 Article

Strength evaluation by using polycarboxylate superplasticizer and solidification efficiency of Cr6+, Pb2+ and Cd2+ in composite based geopolymer

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
Volume 188, Issue -, Pages 807-815

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.04.033

Keywords

Polycarboxylate superplasticizer; Solidification efficiency; Geopolymer; Compressive strength

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Nowadays immobilization of heavy metals is a great challenge. However, geopolymers are promising binders to deal with this problem. Composite based geopolymer was prepared by using Ground Granulated Blast Furnace Slag (GGBFS) and Fly Ash (FA) to evaluate the strength development and solidification efficiency of Chromium (Cr6+), Lead (Pb2+) and Cadmium (Cd2+). Different proportions of polycarboxylate superplasticizer along with alkali activators ratios (Na2SiO3: NaOH), water and temperature conditions were used to estimate the strength development. While, immobilization efficiency was determined by compressive strength and leaching behavior in two extractants i.e. deionized water and citric acid. Results depict that optimum concentration of superplasticizer had increased the compressive strength by reducing water demand after curing at high temperature (70 degrees C). Samples with highest compressive strength were used for solidification efficiency of heavy metals. Solidification efficiency was observed in range of 91-99.99%, which depends on leaching extractant, concentration and nature of metal. Nevertheless, higher leaching of heavy metals was observed in acidic medium due to its strong effect on composite based geopolymer. Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM), X-Ray Diffraction (XRD) and Fourier Transform Infrared Spectrometry (FTIR) results were indicate that all heavy metals in optimum concentrations had effectively immobilized in geopolymer structure by chemical and physical mean. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available