4.7 Article

Mechanical properties of concrete mixed with recycled powder produced from construction and demolition waste

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
Volume 188, Issue -, Pages 720-731

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.277

Keywords

Recycled powder (RP); Construction and demolition (C&D) waste; Recycled powder concrete (RPC); Workability; Early-age cracking; Mechanical properties

Funding

  1. Distinguished Young Scholars Program of the National Natural Science Foundation (NSFC) of PR China [51325802, 51438007]
  2. Research Fund for International Young Scientists of NSFC [51550110234]
  3. China-Japanese Research Cooperative Program - Ministry of Science and technology in China [2016YFE0118200]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Partial replacement of Portland cement with recycled powder (RP) obtained from construction and demolition (C&D) waste has been highlighted as a sustainable approach. This paper presents a comprehensive study to investigate mechanical properties and early-age cracking behavior of recycled powder concrete (RPC) made with two water to binder (w/b) ratios and different RP replacement percentages. RP is found to have relatively high fineness and considerable reactivity. Furthermore, the results indicate that mixes with RP have a higher hydration rate than cement mixes without RP. Up to 30% replacement of RP is found to have positive or minimal negative effect on mechanical properties of RPC. Whereas replacement percentages above 45% lead to considerable decrease in all mechanical properties investigated. Therefore, based on the results, RP replacement percentage in the range of 15%-30% is recommended. The addition of RP is found to adversely affect the concrete's workability and early-age cracking; and cracking control measures should be taken. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available