4.7 Article

FILAMENTS IN SIMULATIONS OF MOLECULAR CLOUD FORMATION

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 791, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/791/2/124

Keywords

evolution; ISM: clouds; stars: formation

Funding

  1. UNAM-DGAPA PAPIIT [IN111313]
  2. CONACYT [102488]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We report on the filaments that develop self-consistently in a new numerical simulation of cloud formation by colliding flows. As in previous studies, the forming cloud begins to undergo gravitational collapse because it rapidly acquires a mass much larger than the average Jeans mass. Thus, the collapse soon becomes nearly pressureless, proceeding along its shortest dimension first. This naturally produces filaments in the cloud and clumps within the filaments. The filaments are not in equilibrium at any time, but instead are long-lived flow features through which the gas flows from the cloud to the clumps. The filaments are long-lived because they accrete from their environment while simultaneously accreting onto the clumps within them; they are essentially the locus where the flow changes from accreting in two dimensions to accreting in one dimension. Moreover, the clumps also exhibit a hierarchical nature: the gas in a filament flows onto a main, central clump but other, smaller-scale clumps form along the infalling gas. Correspondingly, the velocity along the filament exhibits a hierarchy of jumps at the locations of the clumps. Two prominent filaments in the simulation have lengths similar to 15 pc and masses similar to 600 M-circle dot above density n similar to 10(3) cm(-3) (similar to 2 x 10(3) M-circle dot at n > 50 cm(-3)). The density profile exhibits a central flattened core of size similar to 0.3 pc and an envelope that decays as r(-2.5) in reasonable agreement with observations. Accretion onto the filament reaches a maximum linear density rate of similar to 30 M-circle dot Myr(-1) pc(-1).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available