4.2 Article

Quality Control of the Fuzi Lizhong Pill Through Simultaneous Determination of 16 Major Bioactive Constituents by RRLC-MS-MS

Journal

JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHIC SCIENCE
Volume 56, Issue 6, Pages 541-554

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/chromsci/bmy029

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Major State Basic Research Development Program of China, 973 Program [2012CB518401]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81470177]
  3. Central Research Institutes of Basic Research and Public Service Special Operations [YZ-1542]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Fuzi Lizhong pill (FLP) is used to treat gastritis, and the monarch drug of it is Aconiti Lateralis Radix Praeparata (Fuzi, aconite roots) which is a toxic herbal medicine. To better control the safety and quality of FLP, an effective method to analyze the contents of 16 toxic and bioactive components using rapid resolution liquid chromatography-tandem triple-quadrupole mass spectrometer was established. The 16 constituents included aconine, mesaconine, hypaconitine, benzoylaconine, benzoylmesaconine, benzoylhypaconine, adenosine, liquiritin, liquiritigenin, glycyrrhizic acid, isoliquiritigenin, 6-gingerol, atractylenolide III, atractylenolide I, atractylenolide II and glycyrrhetic acid. Ideal separation was performed using gradient elution in 13 min by optimized conditions. All the isomerides were isolated to baseline. The improved method with a polarity switch in contiguous time segments could analyze the five types of components, including polar and nonpolar compounds, without decreasing sensitivity. The proposed method was fully validated. The results revealed that contents of six alkaloids from Fuzi were significantly different among the samples. Using the established method and multivariate statistical method, the quality consistency of two dosage forms of FLP from different companies were analyzed. The optimized method could be used for the quality control of FLP and investigate index compound variation between two dosage forms.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available